Learning to defuse Islamophobia – CSMonitor.com

A poster campaign in Boston bus shelters aims to teach the art of de-escalation in the face of anti-Muslim confrontations.



Islamophobia even worse under Trump than after 9/11 attacks, says top Muslim activist | The Independent

Islamophobia even worse under Trump than after 9/11 attacks, says top Muslim activist

Exclusive: ‘He has empowered and mainstreamed white supremacy and bigotry’


Does the Quran Really Sanction Violence Against ‘Unbelievers’? Huffpost

Recently some prominent talk-show hosts, Sean Hannity among them, have been referring to certain verses in the Quran that appear to call for Muslims to kill non-Muslims. These verses have too often been quoted with what appears to be a willful disregard for the context in which they occur, thus inflaming the emotions of listeners, perpetuating grave misunderstandings, and contributing to the potential for violence on all sides.

Though we may not be able to influence those who are hell-bent on hatred, an explanation is owed to all reasonable people who are interested in the truth of the matter and are not looking to create enemies. The vast majority of Muslims deserve to be seen as allies in a common quest for social justice and human dignity — assuming, of course, that we as Americans have the same goals in mind.

A careful and unbiased study of these and other verses, in their proper context, will reveal that the exhortations to fight “idolaters” and “unbelievers” are specific in nature and are not general injunctions for the murder of all those who refuse to accept Islam as their way of life.

Among the most often cited verses is this one: “Kill the idolaters wherever you find them, and capture them, and blockade them, and watch for them at every lookout…” (Quran 9:5)….. Keep reading .. via Does the Quran Really Sanction Violence Against ‘Unbelievers’? | HuffPost

President Trump’s whole political career has been built on Islamophobia – The Washington Post

You know things are bad in your country when the former grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan praises the president of the United States for retweeting misleading videos about Muslims, peddled by a right-wing hate group from England whose leader was convicted of a hate crime last year.

But that is exactly where we find ourselves.

President Trump’s latest Twitter controversy revolved around him sharing three murky videos purporting to show violent acts by Muslims.>>>>>>>>>

Source read full …..


Islam is the cradle of women’s rights | Arab News

Over the years, feminism has become a term largely associated with being both female and liberal, and that has especially been the case in the Arab and Muslim worlds. It is a term that clerics and preachers have shunned and dubbed a Western concept, a conspiracy to destroy the region’s social fabric and exploit women, among other things. However, it is my belief that Islam is in fact the cradle of feminism, and possibly one of the very few religions that recognizes the important role of women, making them equal in every sense to their male counterparts.
Throughout his life, Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) was surrounded by strong, opinionated and intelligent women, and that fact is quite telling. His aunts, wives and daughters each played crucial roles in preserving and spreading his teachings, in addition to taking part in battles and political life. The Prophet sought their guidance on many occasions, spoke highly of them in public and, most importantly, gave them the space to become the strong women they were.
The woman who played the most significant role in the Prophet’s life was perhaps his first wife, Khadija bint Khuwaylid.>>>>>


The US Supreme Court has empowered Trump’s Islamophobia | Trump | Al Jazeera

On Monday, December 4, the United States Supreme Court allowed the third version of President Donald Trump’s travel ban to take immediate effect. The latest rendition of what is broadly called the “Muslim Ban”, a campaign promise that Trump delivered on three times during the first 10 months of his presidency, limits entry of nationals from six Muslim majority nations (Chad, Iran, Libya, Syria, Somalia and Yemen) and two additional states on which the order has minimal practical effect (North Korea and Venezuela).

The Supreme Court decision is a limited one, overturning the lower court’s restraining orders on the Ban until it is able to rule on the constitutional claims. However, it is significant on several accounts.》》》》》》》》》